Well, you got it any way.
I know, I know py, your penchant is to always offer correction, not receive correction, and misrepresent others. Others have no authority, lol.
I provide information and challenge statements. I never call it "correction". You called it "correction". Which is appealing to authority.
Others need some sort of authority to correct you, even when your post contained zero Scripture? But others posts must have it, not you, correct? That's the old double-standard.
In review. What Scripture did you provide?
Psalm 51 would be a text that would offer you help and to see what I am saying. Psalm 32:1-2 also shows my point as well. Let's watch to see if you try to neutralize them, say they are irrelevant to my point, and reject them. I mean, I gotta be wrong no matter what, correct?
I don't see how Psalm 32:1-2 shows your point and I'm not going to deal with an entire chapter in Psalm 51 simply based upon your appeal.
I'll quote Psalm 32 for you.
Psa 32:2 Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.
Paul references this verse in
Rom 4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,
Your appeal is to action/works. Paul clearly says "without works".
But it does. Sorry, you're incorrect again.
LOL! This isn't even true.
You mentioned his sin, not his entire life.
Your post is record of this. Why make things up when all one need do is look at your post and see that you're not telling the truth here?
You had a rudimentary statement without any reference to specifics. I mention specifics and you appeal to ambiguity. You then accuse me of "not telling the truth". Ethics is not your "strong point".
You referenced zero Scripture inititially.
I referenced the event recorded in the Scriptures. I knew were it was at and the circumstances of the event. Have you refreshed your memory of the event?
My point is we look at the big picture of ones life, not a scene or two. Somehow you took issue with that. Others agreed with my statement, and saw its significance.
Appeal to "others" agreement with you isn't evidence. Were the apostles beaten and eventually killed because others agreed with them?
No one disagress Peter sinned, so that point is mere misrepresentation on your part. You have no point there, you're fabricating. Why do you do this? So you can appear as if you've won and are correct?
PY, people here are smart enough to look back at posts and see that you are misrepresenting me.
I didn't misrepresent you. I simply asked a question. You then proceed to "correct" me. Even "calling out" that correct. Maybe I should take the same action.
You've been corrected.... Now repent.
Everyone endless sins. Over and over again. No one ceases from sin. No one. Not the apostles. Not you. Not I. No one ceases from sin. You appealed to a "lifetime of works" as evidence. I would never do that. I know human beings too well. I'm one. You're one. I know what we do. We sin. Peter sinned over and over again.
Just you're aware. Peter isn't my example. Christ is. If I compare myself to Him, then I'd much rather shut my mouth and let Him shine..... than try to say "judge me by my life"....
Nope. "Judge me by Christ".