Hi from UK. And portugal. I live in both....

[Mikeuk]

Hi all.

I am passionate about catholicism, and science as a one time professional, and how science is abused by atheists to give answers it cannot give.

 

[Carbon]

Hi all.

I am passionate about catholicism, and science as a one time professional, and how science is abused by atheists to give answers it cannot give.

Welcome. Hope you enjoy the forum

Blessings

 

[Fred]

Welcome aboard.

 

[makesends]

Hi all.

I am passionate about catholicism, and science as a one time professional, and how science is abused by atheists to give answers it cannot give.

Interesting. Start a thread on how science is abused! I would like to hear your take.

 

[Munro]

Greetings to both countries!

 

[Mikeuk]

Interesting. Start a thread on how science is abused! I would like to hear your take.

There are a lot of facets to that, and i will in due course,

I will give One example.

I have demonstrated on a thread that using the rules of scientific process

There is not even a valid hypothesis of abiogenesis. It is neither theory nor hypothesis.
Nobody has any idea ,where, when , or how, it happened. It does not repeat and cannot be repeated.
nor do they have any idea of a structure of the first life, or a process for non life to Life, without which there is nothing to test so no hypothesis.

Worse than that , the first life by definition has irreducible complexity, and the minimum cell we know has hundreds of gebes.
Not only does nobody know what the first genome was, there is not even a guess at how evolution of first life to modern cells evolved.

So OOL research has nothing at cellular level. From first life to now is completely blank.
yet the materialist atheists tell us it is a “ factl

The gates of Science are guarded by athesists and is no longer honest about what it knows.

On the other hand the large amount of forensics of modern Eucharistic miracles , multiple events, teams and places is such that
the one non Religious pathologist investigating said it is “ compelling evidence of created heart tissue”
Few know that Darwin put his own falsification criterion in his theory. These events trigger it, and falsify Darwin.

yet not a whimper in media….

I intend threads on euchafistic mirackes, philosophy of science and how little it really tells us, and on consciousness : increasingly demonstrable , confirmed by many medics, as not confined to the brain. So life is not just a chemical process.

then is the science of miracles…

 

[Alive]

Sound like you may have read ‘Signature in the Cell’ and or ‘Darwin’s Doubt’.

 

[Mikeuk]

Sound like you may have read ‘Signature in the Cell’ and or ‘Darwin’s Doubt’.

Neither.
I have a huge book on molecular biology next to my desk.
I have read many papers on Abiogenesis .
I’ve read origin of species , and it shows that Darwins actual hypothesus is progressive small change.
Eucharistic miracles disprove it by the terms Darwin set
i have studied abiogenesis since an article in new scientist talked about protocells 50 years ago.
Very little has moved on since then.
If anything the cell is being seen as more complex than anyone guessed.
The simplest bacteria is orders of magnitude more complex than any chemical factory build by man.
unkike Them it is self sustaining, self evolving , and supposedly self de signing!

Im actualky an electronic physicist / mathematician , not a biologist, but chemistry is common ground,

 

[Alive]

Neither.
I have a huge book on molecular biology next to my desk.
I have read many papers on Abiogenesis .
I’ve read origin of species , and it shows that Darwins actual hypothesus is progressive small change.
Eucharistic miracles disprove it by the terms Darwin set
i have studied abiogenesis since an article in new scientist talked about protocells 50 years ago.
Very little has moved on since then.
If anything the cell is being seen as more complex than anyone guessed.
The simplest bacteria is orders of magnitude more complex than any chemical factory build by man.
unkike Them it is self sustaining, self evolving , and supposedly self de signing!

Im actualky an electronic physicist / mathematician , not a biologist, but chemistry is common ground,

Ya…I dug into cellular biology, as well. I see the Lord there in spades.