• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Grace Defined

Odë:hgöd

Well Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2023
Messages
1,440
Reaction score
116
Points
63
Location
Oregon
~
2Pet 3:18 . .Grow in grace

The Greek word translated "grace" is charis (khar'-ece) which basically means
graciousness: defined by Webster's as kind, courteous, inclined to good will,
generous, charitable, merciful, altruistic, compassionate, thoughtful, cordial,
affable, genial, sociable, cheerful, warm, sensitive, considerate, and tactful.

Cordial stresses warmth and heartiness

Affable implies easy to approach, and readiness to respond pleasantly to
conversation or requests or proposals

Genial stresses cheerfulness and even joviality

Sociable suggests a genuine liking for the companionship of others

Generous is characterized by a noble or forbearing spirit; viz: magnanimous, kindly,
and liberal in giving

Charitable means full of love for, and goodwill toward, others; viz: benevolent,
tolerant, and lenient.

Altruistic means unselfish regard for, or devotion to, the welfare of others; viz: a
desire to be of service to others for no other reason than it just feels good to do so.

Compassionate pertains to a sympathetic awareness of others' distress combined with
a desire to alleviate it.

Tactful indicates a keen sense of what to do, or say, in order to maintain good
relations with others in order to resolve and/or avoid unnecessary conflict.
_
 
Last edited:
I expect that you intend this OP to lead somewhere. If is to do so, it does so only by implications, none of which you point out.

I reject the implication, that, (if it can be established, not just asserted, that 'Altruistic' is defining of Grace), a proper meaning for 'altruistic' includes any notion of "[because] it just feels good to do so".

But I am curious where you mean to take this.
 
Folks born with defective amygdalae are sometimes unable to commiserate with
others in distress because they've been deprived of certain elements of humanness
like sympathy, empathy, and pity.

With the right kind of sensitivity training, callous folks can be taught how to be a
bit more thoughtful than their normal selves. It's a phony thoughtfulness, but at
least like that they're tolerable instead of insufferable.
_
 
Last edited:
~
Gen 6:7-8 . .The Lord said: "I will destroy Man whom I have created from the
face of the earth, both Man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am
sorry that I have made them." But Noah found grace in the eyes of The Lord.

That's the first-ever mention of grace in the Bible. It's translated from a Hebrew
word that basically means the same things as the Greek word that was explored in
post No.1

In a nutshell; God's good vibes about Noah were very different than the negative
feelings He was experiencing about everybody else. In point of fact; they were all a
terrible disappointment. God had it mind to put them all down like as if they were
sick dogs, but no so Noah; him God had in mind to spare, i.e. to protect; and that
was mostly because Noah was the kind of man with whom God preferred to
associate rather than avoid.

Gen 6:9 . . Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time,
and he walked with God.

Noah is highly recommended as one of a trio of very pious guys. The other two
were Daniel and Job (Ezek 14:14) So the grace that Noah found in God's eyes
wasn't a freebee, no, it was compensation, viz: Noah deserved protection whereas
the others of his day deserved to be gone.

Gen 7:1 . .The Lord then said to Noah; "Go into the ark, you and your whole
family, because I have found you righteous in this generation."
_
 
~
Gen 6:7-8 . .The Lord said: "I will destroy Man whom I have created from the
face of the earth, both Man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am
sorry that I have made them." But Noah found grace in the eyes of The Lord.

That's the first-ever mention of grace in the Bible. It's translated from a Hebrew
word that basically means the same things as the Greek word that was explored in
post No.1

In a nutshell; God's good vibes about Noah were very different than the negative
feelings He was experiencing about everybody else. In point of fact; they were all a
terrible disappointment. God had it mind to put them all down like as if they were
sick dogs, but no so Noah; him God had in mind to spare, i.e. to protect; and that
was mostly because Noah was the kind of man with whom God preferred to
associate rather than avoid.

Gen 6:9 . . Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time,
and he walked with God.

Noah is highly recommended as one of a trio of very pious guys. The other two
were Daniel and Job (Ezek 14:14) So the grace that Noah found in God's eyes
wasn't a freebee, no, it was compensation, viz: Noah deserved protection whereas
the others of his day deserved to be gone.

Gen 7:1 . .The Lord then said to Noah; "Go into the ark, you and your whole
family, because I have found you righteous in this generation."
_
Grace isn't given because of qualifications people have but it can be. God often bestows salvation on people who aren't even interested in Him or seeking Him. It's all grace.
 
~
It's difficult to discuss grace with Christians because many them are thoroughly
unable to see it as relative to one's personal characteristics.

For example; Cain resented his kid brother's piety, and he was snippy with God.
Cain was also capable of passionate violence. Ouch! a very non-gracious man
around whom nobody would be comfortable except maybe his fellow inmates in San
Quentin and/or Riker's Island.
_
 
~
Rom 12:10b . . Honor others as above yourselves.

Thank You isn't an epithet, nor is gratitude a vice. Those are social graces that go a
long ways towards letting others know that we think they count for something, i.e.
that they have value, and that they matter in the grand scheme of things.

Gratitude helps make others feel better about themselves; and God only knows
everyone can use a boost these days when the integrity of government, law
enforcement, the justice system, medicine, education, science, nutrition, the
economy, politics, religion, morality, and national defense have been compromised
by "woke" philosophies and practices.

The deep state has of late has been making it increasing difficult for good folks to
feel appreciated; instead they've been criminalized as deplorables, extremists,
insurrectionists, racists, child abusers, and domestic terrorists, et al.

God is a "big boy" so to speak who doesn't need to be appreciated in order to feel
better about Himself. But still; God would like some recognition on occasion.

Eph 5:20 . . Always giving thanks to God the Father for everything, in the name of
our Lord Jesus Christ.

Moses' people were so accustomed to God's providence that they began to take it
for granted, and would get upset with Him when He failed to produce, viz: they
believed themselves "entitled" like many of today's Millennials and Generation Z
tech-savvy college grads. Be on your guard; don't become like them because that
would be very unbecoming, i.e. lacking grace.

1Thess 5:18 . . Be grateful in all circumstances, for this is God's will for you in
Christ Jesus.

When upon life's billows you are tempest tossed,
When you are discouraged, thinking all is lost.
Count your many blessings, name them one by one,
And it will surprise you what the Lord hath done.

Johnson Oatman, Jr. (1897)

Ps 118:1 . . O give thanks unto The Lord; for He is good
_
 
~
Various casino games in Las Vegas are deliberately, and legally, adjusted to give
the house an edge. In other words some games-- e.g. slots, baccarat, roulette,
blackjack, and craps --are unfair; but not they're not dishonest.

The law allows it because whereas players are typically gambling for entertainment,
the house is there to make a living. So if the games were fair, the tables wouldn't win
enough to stay in business.

In Christianity's plan of salvation, the tables are turned. Players have the
advantage because God has made it impossible for them to lose just so long as
they go for the gold (so to speak) according to His rules rather than insisting upon
their own. For example:

Heb 2:9 . . But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, now
crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of
God he might taste death for everyone.

Routine death is pretty much inevitable, but the second death per Rev 20:11-15
can be easily avoided if we buy into Jesus' trip to the cross per Isa 53:6

2Cor 5:19 . . God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting
men's sins against them.

Sins are losses. But when sins aren't counted, then there's nothing to lose; only
everything to gain.

For example: records are being kept on everyone. However, when there are no sins
entered in someone's record, then it will be as though they were 100% innocent
their entire lives. That is a very, very big advantage.

In Las Vegas, advantaged players-- e.g. card counters --are oftentimes asked to
leave the premises and never come back; whereas God-- gracious soul that He is
--encourages folks to become advantaged, and to stay with Him as consistent
winners in the game of life: really big winners.
_
 
~
Various casino games in Las Vegas are deliberately, and legally, adjusted to give
the house an edge. In other words some games-- e.g. slots, baccarat, roulette,
blackjack, and craps --are unfair; but not they're not dishonest.

The law allows it because whereas players are typically gambling for entertainment,
the house is there to make a living. So if the games were fair, the tables wouldn't win
enough to stay in business.

In Christianity's plan of salvation, the tables are turned. Players have the
advantage because God has made it impossible for them to lose just so long as
they go for the gold (so to speak) according to His rules rather than insisting upon
their own. For example:

Heb 2:9 . . But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, now
crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of
God he might taste death for everyone.

Routine death is pretty much inevitable, but the second death per Rev 20:11-15
can be easily avoided if we buy into Jesus' trip to the cross per Isa 53:6

2Cor 5:19 . . God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting
men's sins against them.

Sins are losses. But when sins aren't counted, then there's nothing to lose; only
everything to gain.

For example: records are being kept on everyone. However, when there are no sins
entered in someone's record, then it will be as though they were 100% innocent
their entire lives. That is a very, very big advantage.

In Las Vegas, advantaged players-- e.g. card counters --are oftentimes asked to
leave the premises and never come back; whereas God-- gracious soul that He is
--encourages folks to become advantaged, and to stay with Him as consistent
winners in the game of life: really big winners.
_
So do you ignore people as a matter of course because unless they say something challenging you, you deem them unworthy of response? It would be interesting to see how you interact with the comments I made before. Otherwise, I take it people are beneath you.
 
I expect that you intend this OP to lead somewhere. If is to do so, it does so only by implications, none of which you point out.

I reject the implication, that, (if it can be established, not just asserted, that 'Altruistic' is defining of Grace), a proper meaning for 'altruistic' includes any notion of "[because] it just feels good to do so".

But I am curious where you mean to take this.
When you get ignored, it's best to leave them to their madness and advertisements.
 
~
Blessings in both the Old Testament and the New are typically benevolent actions,
i.e. expressions of good will rather than expressions of ill will.

The first of the Bible's many blessings took place in the beginning where it says in
Genesis 1:20-23

"And God said: Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the
earth across the expanse of the sky. So God created the great creatures of the sea
and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their
kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
God blessed them and said: Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in
the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth."

So then, fertility shouldn't be taken for granted because those creatures didn't have
it till God gave it to them after they were created. God repeated the procedure with
mankind, i.e. Adam was created sterile, and then afterwards endowed with fertility
per Genesis 1:27-28 so he could reproduce himself, viz: fertility was a finishing
touch to the creation process, i.e. it was an empowerment freely given with no strings
attached.

Personally I think God would've been within His rights to revoke Adam's blessing
when he tasted the forbidden fruit; and let mankind become extinct. But instead of
going to that extreme, God allowed the Serpent to tamper with Adam's fertility in
such a way as to make it impossible for him to produce immortal offspring.

So then, although the blessing of fertility is mostly intact, it's original characteristics
have been modified a bit to ensure the human body survives for only a relatively
little while before succumbing to old age; but at least mankind is still here instead
of blotted out like it could've been.

Anyway: blessings reveal that the supreme being isn't entirely indifferent, but that
He has a sensitive side to Him, i.e. a gracious side.
_
 
~
"I just came to praise the Lord."

(Wayne Romero, 1975)

** The melody that accompanies that hymn is typically the very first music that
pops into my head when I'm at peace; probably because it's one of the few tunes
that I was able to learn on a G harmonica back in the decade of the 1970s

Praise can be expressed in a variety of ways, e.g.

Commendations
Approval
Merits
Lauding
Applauding
Kudos
Atta-boys
Recognition
Recommendations
Awards
Accolades
Admiration
Appreciation
Idolizing (following a role model's example)
etc.

Praise can also be expressed by simply pointing out the things that we like best
about someone, i.e. the very opposite would be a roast which even in fun are
thoughtless and cruel.

Below's statement can be taken as either a matter of fact or an expression of
praise.

"The Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I
came from God." (John 16:27)

** The Greek word translated "loves" basically pertains to fraternal feelings, i.e.
emotions and affections that lead to bonding not easily dissolved.

Out ahead at some time in the future, Christians will be subjected to an evaluation.
No doubt the Lord will find much to critique, but also something to approve. (1Cor
4:5) We can kind of see that going on in Jesus' critique of the seven churches per
Rev 1:11-3:22.

An incident occurred during Jesus' travels when he encountered some folk who
apparently marginalized God's approval by placing more value on acceptance by
their peers.

"No wonder you can't believe! For you gladly honor each other, but you don't care
about the honor that comes from God alone." (John 5:44)

** I read recently that numbers of young people are developing complexes due to
winning fewer "likes" on social media than the other kids.
_
 
~
"I just came to praise the Lord."

(Wayne Romero, 1975)

** The melody that accompanies that hymn is typically the very first music that
pops into my head when I'm at peace; probably because it's one of the few tunes
that I was able to learn on a G harmonica back in the decade of the 1970s

Praise can be expressed in a variety of ways, e.g.

Commendations
Approval
Merits
Lauding
Applauding
Kudos
Atta-boys
Recognition
Recommendations
Awards
Accolades
Admiration
Appreciation
Idolizing (following a role model's example)
etc.

Praise can also be expressed by simply pointing out the things that we like best
about someone, i.e. the very opposite would be a roast which even in fun are
thoughtless and cruel.

Below's statement can be taken as either a matter of fact or an expression of
praise.

"The Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I
came from God." (John 16:27)

** The Greek word translated "loves" basically pertains to fraternal feelings, i.e.
emotions and affections that lead to bonding not easily dissolved.

Out ahead at some time in the future, Christians will be subjected to an evaluation.
No doubt the Lord will find much to critique, but also something to approve. (1Cor
4:5) We can kind of see that going on in Jesus' critique of the seven churches per
Rev 1:11-3:22.

An incident occurred during Jesus' travels when he encountered some folk who
apparently marginalized God's approval by placing more value on acceptance by
their peers.

"No wonder you can't believe! For you gladly honor each other, but you don't care
about the honor that comes from God alone." (John 5:44)

** I read recently that numbers of young people are developing complexes due to
winning fewer "likes" on social media than the other kids.
_
Hello.

Do you communicate with other human beings or do you type words to tell other people what you think only?
 
~
I wanna live
I wanna give,
I've been a miner for a heart of gold.
It's these expressions I never give,
That keep me searching for a heart of gold.

(Neil Young, 1971)

Generosity is a gracious virtue but it's not the end-all. For example:

"The Lord said to Moses: Tell the Israelites to bring me an offering. You are to
receive the offering for me from each man whose heart prompts him to give. (Ex
25:1-2)

In other words: contributions toward construction of a centralized location for the
people to worship had to be charitable rather than mandatory, i.e. the people's
wealth wasn't extracted from them by force of law; that came later with the
institution of tithing.

Christian contributions are supposed to be collected in the same charitable frame of
mind.

"And here is my advice about what is best for you in this matter: Last year you
were the first not only to give but also to have the desire to do so. Now finish the
work, so that your eager willingness to do it may be matched by your completion of
it, according to your means. For if the willingness is there, the gift is acceptable
according to what one has, not according to what he does not have. (2Cor 8:10-12)

A church I was attending back in the decade of the 1990s launched an ambitious
spending plan and goaded folks into contributing towards it by circulating a flyer
praising the generosity of Moses' people towards the Tabernacle. But quietly, on the
side, I casually mentioned that those very same people refused to invade the
promised land when God instructed them to: consequently, many ended up never
allowed to go in.

The Bible says faith without works is dead (Jas 2:17-26) Well, I posit the opposite
is also true, to wit: works without faith are dead. So I think we pretty much have to
concede that generosity doesn't truly count as a gracious virtue when the contributor
is resisting The Lord instead of following Him.

"The Lord detests the sacrifice of the wicked" (Prov 15:8)

"If we claim to have fellowship with him yet walk in the darkness; we lie and do not
live by the truth". (1John 1:6)
_
 
Last edited:
@ Dave_Regenerated

Hello;

This is to inform you that I don't have the patience to be distracted by your
remarks so I've placed you on my ignore list. Others will still be able to view
your posts; just not me. Sorry.
_
 
~
Rom 12:16 . . Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but
condescend to men of low estate.

The Greek word translated "condescend" basically means to associate with others
as equals; so in this case i think our verse would be better expressed as "Don't be
elitist, but willing to associate with people below you."

That's pretty much the theme in Jane Austen's novel Pride And Prejudice wherein a
snobby aristocrat falls in love with a girl whose station in life is too far below his
own to be acceptable.

Well; I think there just might be an event depicted in the 13th of Judges that will
suit our purpose wherein a holy man-- labeled an angel of The Lord --revealed, first
to Manoah's barren wife, and then to him, that they were going to have a special
baby.

The astounding part of the story is the angel's willingness to accommodate
Manoah's request to standby on-hold awaiting him to prepare a burnt offering.
The angel of The Lord certainly didn't have to do that seeing as how Manoah's
station in life was immeasurably below that of his own; easily evidenced by the
angel's ability to ascend into the sky amidst fire.
_
 
~
The 14th chapter of Genesis relates how Abraham captained an operation to rescue
his nephew Lot and the people of Sodom who had been taken prisoners by an
aggressor from the north. While wrapping things up, Sodom's head of state offered
to compensate Abraham. Here's how that went:

Gen 14:21 . .Then the king of Sodom said to Abram: Give me the persons, and
take the possessions for yourself.

Sheik Bera was very grateful to Abraham (a.k.a. Abram), and asked only for the
return of his fellow citizens; but not for the return of their stolen goods. Abram was
more than welcome to keep it all for himself.

But Abram refused. There was just no way he was going to get rich by exploiting
his own neighbors' misfortunes. Although he had a perfect right, within the customs
of that day, to all the spoils of war, he waived the right in favor of looking out for
Sheik Bera's best interests. I tell you, this man Abraham was incredibly gracious;
and his manner of life, on the whole, made his religion, and his deity, look pretty
good.

Gen 14:22-23 . .But Abram said to the king of Sodom: I swear to the Lord God
Most High, Creator of heaven and earth; I will not take so much as a thread or a
sandal strap of what is yours; you shall not say: It is I who made Abram rich.

Abraham didn't need Bera's stuff anyway. He had plenty back home already. Why
be greedy? I mean: how much does it really take to satisfy? Does a man really
have to own every skyscraper, every square foot of real estate, every drop of
water, every cow, pig, and chicken, every inch of agricultural land, every fruit and
vegetable seed sold around the world, every watt of electricity, every telephone
system, every share of stock in a blue chip company, every software program,
every car dealership, every oil well, every refinery, every electric generating plant,
every natural gas supplier, a monopoly on insecticide and weed killer, every utility,
and every hotel and apartment building before he feels he has enough?

When will the big box managers finally say "Let's stop expanding. We have enough
market share". They never will because the greedy nature of super stores knows no
bounds.

As I watched a NetFlix documentary about corn production; the producers visited a
facility that makes high fructose corn syrup. The manager of the plant was asked
how much market share his product had. After answering, he was then asked how
much market share he would like to have; and he answered "all of it"

Abraham was far and away more gracious than the likes of the predatory ENRON
traders who took advantage of forest fires in California some years ago to raise that
State's electric rates.
_
 
~
Matt 20:1-2 . . .The kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in
the morning to hire men to work in his vineyard. He agreed to pay them a denarius
for the day and sent them into his vineyard.

Here in my area of the State of Oregon, the above is a common sight in the
communities adjacent to agriculture. Low-income men assemble in designated
areas hoping for farmers to come by and select themselves for day labor.

Of course the most able-bodied men are picked first, and the rest spend the day
hoping against hope that their luck will improve on the next go-round. Time works
against them; hour by hour the sun moves ever closer to the end of the day when
it will be too dark to work outdoors. We're talking about men who live hand to
mouth, so a zero-dollar day is a huge inconvenience.

But this one landowner in the story is very interesting. He kept checking in with
the rejected men, even till almost the very end of the day, and little by little ended
up putting them all to work plus; of all things, he paid everyone the same wage
from the earliest hires to the latest.

We're not told outright what motivated the landowner to be so generous but it's my
guess he was moved by strong feelings of compassion for the weaker men passed
over in favor of the more able-bodied guys; which is an unusual business model in
the dog-eat-dog world of capital and labor wherein the strong survive and the weak
forgotten.
_
 
~
Long story short: Abraham's first son Ishmael was by means of sleeping with a
female slave. His latter son Isaac was by means of sleeping with his wife Sarah.
So then the slave's son, as the one born first, was legally entitled to be Abraham's
principal heir. But there was a way to dissolve the arrangement.

According to the customs of that day, Abraham could legally disown the slave
woman's son if he emancipated her; which he did.

"He . . . sent her away." (Gen 21:14)

The phrase "sent her away" is from a versatile Hebrew word that can be used of
divorce as well as for the emancipation of slaves. In other words: Hagar wasn't
banished as is commonly assumed; no, she was set free; and it's very important to
nail that down in our thinking because if Abraham had merely banished Hagar, then
their son Ishmael would have retained his legal status as Abraham's principal heir.


NOTE: Ishmael retained his status as one of Abraham's natural sons (Gen 25:9)
but in legal matters relative to inheritance he's no son at all.

Anyway, the "grace" aspect of my story pertains to Hagar's and Ishmael's
departure.

Gen 21:14 . . Early next morning Abraham took some bread and a skin of water,
and gave them to Hagar. He placed them over her shoulder,

The Hebrew word for "bread" here includes all foods; for man or beast. So Abraham
didn't necessarily send the poor woman out on her own with a ration of bread and
water like some sort of hardened criminal, but very likely provisioned Hagar and
Ishmael with enough camper-grade food stuffs to keep them going for a while.

Ishmael was at least a teen-ager by this time seeing as he was fourteen when Isaac
was born (Gen 13:24-26 + Gen 21:5) And Hagar wasn't emancipated till after Isaac
was weaned. (Gen 21:8-10)

The thing is: Abraham didn't dispatch a servant or a butler to equip Hagar. Nor did
Abraham bring the provisions out to her, dump them at her feet, and walk away.
No, he put them up on Hagar's shoulder himself; with his own hands; which he
really didn't have to do.

There's no record of ever any ill will between Hagar and Abraham, nor any between
him and his boy Ishmael either. In point of fact, cutting Ishmael lose was not easy
for Abraham. (Gen 17:18 & Gen 21:11)

Those three were truly family in every sense of the word-- mom, dad, and child.
There couldn't have been a dry eye nor a cheerful face at any time during this
excruciating farewell. If you've ever experienced something so upsetting as to
make you nauseous, lead-bellied, and lose your appetite; then you know what I'm
talking about. Anybody who can read this story without feeling the slightest twinge
of compassion for any one of those three; has got to be the most insensitive clod
on earth.
_
 
~
In the eighth chapter of John's gospel, Jesus was teaching in the Temple courtyard
when some of his opponents showed up with a woman caught red-handed in
adultery. They presented her to Jesus to see if he agreed with Moses in regard to
executing adulterers (Lev 20:10) Exactly why they brought the woman I don't
know because they could've just raised their hand and asked him without all the
drama.

Anyway, long story short, Jesus persuaded the woman's accusers to disqualify
themselves and then told her, in so many words, that he himself had no intention
of condemning her.

The thing is: Had Jesus problems with "mommy issues" that incident would've been
a golden opportunity to take them out on someone, but instead he was a perfect
gentleman with that woman: a fallen woman no less.
_
 
Back
Top