See post #12 above.
@Carbon got the point of the OP.
Yes, and nothing I posted should be construed to say otherwise. Examine the wording of the op.
I suppose with the advent of AI, even many of our responses are suspect, not knowing if it's the actual poster making a post or AI.
I suppose with the advent of AI, even many of our responses are suspect, not knowing if it's the actual poster making a post or [a poster quoting an AI search response].
I suppose with the advent of AI, even many of our responses are suspect, not knowing if it's the actual poster making a post or AI [making a post].
I suppose with the advent of AI, even many of our responses are suspect, not knowing if it's [AI making a post].
The ambiguity is in the op and my posts covered all the bases. They are not off topic
(extra-topical, perhaps, but not off topic), and I stand by what I posted. Bots aren't likely to be posting and there are multiple ways to tell if that happens, or if a poster is quoting an AI result
(several posts have already observed AI quotes and the troubles/falsehoods thereof). Rule 3.2 applies to any heretical AI content
(if and when discovered) and a simple request for the source of any quote will reveal a lot more (assuming posters are honest and forthcoming with each other
).
@CrowCross is also on the right track but did not delve far enough into the op-relevant realities of AI. One way AI can also be discerned is via language, which is often incorrect despite the self-learning of large language models. Another way has to do with the predictive propensity of AI. It's likely to run afoul of discussion board requirements for, ironically, staying on topic
. AI's algorithm must maintain predictive responses accordingly. AI can do only what is is programmed to do and..... what it is often programmed to do is promote itself and specific viewpoints
(propaganda).
This forum identifies bots (at least partially) so, conceivably, any bot that has posted will be identifiable.
Ultimately, the problem with AI is the human response to AI. Fear is never a rational or appropriate basis for anything but facing God uncovered in His Son's blood
. Yet we have a large portion of Christendom that imagine AI to be the devil (or under the control thereof) and never something to be wielded victoriously by those in Christ's body.
Newsflash post #3 or this post of yours has nothing to do with the OP. See posts #4, #6
Think it through.
See post #12 above.
@Carbon got the point of the OP.
Yes, and nothing I have posted should have been construed to say otherwise. Think it through.
