Darwin's Dilemma, God spoke and it was fully formed

[Hobie]

The fossil record shows that nearly all major animal groups abruptly appeared on earth. Dubbed the 'Cambrian explosion,' this dramatic burst of biodiversity without clear evolutionary precursors has created headaches for evolutionists ever since Darwin. He knew that if the animals were found fully formed and didnt 'evolve', that the fossil record contradicted what his 'theory of evolution' predicted. In his book 'On the Origin of Species', Darwin declared that if his theory of evolution were true “it is indisputable that before the lowest Cambrian stratum was deposited… the world swarmed with living creatures.” Yet Darwin admitted that the fossil record below the Cambrian strata did not show such creatures. Instead “species belonging to several of the main divisions of the animal kingdom suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks" without any evidence of prior ancestral forms.

Darwin frankly acknowledged that this lack of ancestral forms was “a valid argument” against his theory. But Darwin basically hoped that time would provide the evidence that was lacking. And now we have the James Webb Space Telescope show much the same in the heavens, were they hoped to see empty space before the Big Bang, they find fully formed galaxies and stars. It is a problem as if their theory of the Big Bang is correct, these telescopes should be able to see ‘times’ when no stars or galaxies exist. But it appears stars and galaxies exist, no matter how far out they look.....

So what will it do to their theory if no part of the visible universe fails to contain stars or galaxies and instead the heavens testify of Creation exactly as described in Scripture....
Psalm 33:6
6 By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.

Psalm 33:9
9 For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.

Hebrews 11:3
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

Genesis 1:1-5
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

​

 

[CrowCross]

The fossil record shows that nearly all major animal groups abruptly appeared on earth. Dubbed the 'Cambrian explosion,' this dramatic burst of biodiversity without clear evolutionary precursors has created headaches for evolutionists ever since Darwin. He knew that if the animals were found fully formed and didnt 'evolve', that the fossil record contradicted what his 'theory of evolution' predicted. In his book 'On the Origin of Species', Darwin declared that if his theory of evolution were true “it is indisputable that before the lowest Cambrian stratum was deposited… the world swarmed with living creatures.” Yet Darwin admitted that the fossil record below the Cambrian strata did not show such creatures. Instead “species belonging to several of the main divisions of the animal kingdom suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks" without any evidence of prior ancestral forms.

Darwin frankly acknowledged that this lack of ancestral forms was “a valid argument” against his theory. But Darwin basically hoped that time would provide the evidence that was lacking. And now we have the James Webb Space Telescope show much the same in the heavens, were they hoped to see empty space before the Big Bang, they find fully formed galaxies and stars. It is a problem as if their theory of the Big Bang is correct, these telescopes should be able to see ‘times’ when no stars or galaxies exist. But it appears stars and galaxies exist, no matter how far out they look.....

So what will it do to their theory if no part of the visible universe fails to contain stars or galaxies and instead the heavens testify of Creation exactly as described in Scripture....
Psalm 33:6
6 By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.

Psalm 33:9
9 For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.

Hebrews 11:3
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

Genesis 1:1-5
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

​

It appears that Darwin didn't know of or accept the truth behind the world wide flood of Noahs day...that deposited sediment all over the world and buried all kinds of creatures which fossilized.

It seems logical that bottom dwelling aquatic animals such as the trilobite would be buried at the lowest level of strata. This supports the flood model.

 

[EarlyActs]

The fossil record shows that nearly all major animal groups abruptly appeared on earth. Dubbed the 'Cambrian explosion,' this dramatic burst of biodiversity without clear evolutionary precursors has created headaches for evolutionists ever since Darwin. He knew that if the animals were found fully formed and didnt 'evolve', that the fossil record contradicted what his 'theory of evolution' predicted. In his book 'On the Origin of Species', Darwin declared that if his theory of evolution were true “it is indisputable that before the lowest Cambrian stratum was deposited… the world swarmed with living creatures.” Yet Darwin admitted that the fossil record below the Cambrian strata did not show such creatures. Instead “species belonging to several of the main divisions of the animal kingdom suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks" without any evidence of prior ancestral forms.

Darwin frankly acknowledged that this lack of ancestral forms was “a valid argument” against his theory. But Darwin basically hoped that time would provide the evidence that was lacking. And now we have the James Webb Space Telescope show much the same in the heavens, were they hoped to see empty space before the Big Bang, they find fully formed galaxies and stars. It is a problem as if their theory of the Big Bang is correct, these telescopes should be able to see ‘times’ when no stars or galaxies exist. But it appears stars and galaxies exist, no matter how far out they look.....

So what will it do to their theory if no part of the visible universe fails to contain stars or galaxies and instead the heavens testify of Creation exactly as described in Scripture....
Psalm 33:6
6 By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.

Psalm 33:9
9 For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.

Hebrews 11:3
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

Genesis 1:1-5
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

​

Mostly true; in the celestial realm there is the red-star vs blue-star feature, where the nearest show one color while the farthest show the other.

Do you think, though, that the 'spreading out' of Job-Psalms-Isaiah is at the same time as Genesis 1? I do not find this to be the case by clues in it. The way of creating (by God's order) is certainly there, but not the timing.

Notice the difference about lights, in two stages, and even the use of the verb 'brooding' by the Spirit is a suggestion of two steps, an initial, and a final.

As you may know, the dilemma of recent science about the BB is that it does lend support to a 'spreading out.' I've read the expression 'infinitely small', used to describe the mass just before the event, but then no explanation how such a thing results in the total mass we know is there. In the Rogan-Meyer interview this resulted in saying that the event was a miracle even though they did not connect it with the 'spreading out.'

 

[CrowCross]

but then no explanation how such a thing results in the total mass we know is there.

From what I understand there is more stars in the sky in the heavens than grains of sand on the beaches.
That's mind blowing when you sit on a beach and look up and down the coast for miles and all you see is sand.

All those galaxies..with all those stars, planets, dust....dark matter?....all squashed up....Compressed....Into an 'infinitely small' space....then went BANG!!! They say it was a "big" bang.