• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Copied from @TrevorL

Rella

"Daughter of the King"
Joined
Jul 30, 2023
Messages
710
Reaction score
274
Points
63
Location
PA
Faith
Christian
Country
USA
Marital status
unmarried
Politics
YES. Always looking right.
Do not participate in politics - God rules in the kingdoms of men Daniel 4:17

As much as I enjoy a good down in the mud sling fast with those of opposite political views... I think we should all heed @TrevorL 's admonition from Daniel.

After all, we are told that Romans 13:

1Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. 2Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. (Can we say that is why The Donald got 4 indictments almost back to back?)

Also, That means that Joe, Kamala, Nancy, and even Adam were established from God... and yes, even AOC.

Likely because it is time for the American (Empire) to complete it's fall ... for NO ONE stays on top forever,

Sure am glad I no longer need to vote... WOW... that sure takes a great weight off. Thank you Trevor.
 
Do not participate in politics - God rules in the kingdoms of men Daniel 4:17

As much as I enjoy a good down in the mud sling fast with those of opposite political views... I think we should all heed @TrevorL 's admonition from Daniel.

After all, we are told that Romans 13:

1Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. 2Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. (Can we say that is why The Donald got 4 indictments almost back to back?)

Also, That means that Joe, Kamala, Nancy, and even Adam were established from God... and yes, even AOC.

Likely because it is time for the American (Empire) to complete it's fall ... for NO ONE stays on top forever,

Sure am glad I no longer need to vote... WOW... that sure takes a great weight off. Thank you Trevor.
The separation of Christians from the rest of the world was a preeminent feature of John Darby's Dispensationalism in the mid-1800s. As a consequence, a growing number of Christians abdicated all civic responsibility and Darwinism, Marxism, Freudianism, Existentialism, and Postmodernism filled the void. Abortion was the result. Government becoming the messiah was the result. In the late 1960s a theologian named Francis Schaeffer wrote about the Christian failure to maintain both a Christian worldview that applied to all domains of human existence, and participation in God's kingdom resulting in an increase in worldliness. Schaeffer was instrumental in reawakening and re-energizing Christians in America.

Presuppositionally..... what the separation position means is that there are places in God's creation where God doesn't rule and doesn't expect His people to rule. This creates a "two-kingdoms" theology where God rules one way in one kingdom and another not-so-effective way in another. It means God wants it that way. This position means the dominion mandate (Gen. 1:28) has been withdrawn. The great commission (Mt. 28:19-20) is withdrawn.

Yet nowhere in the entirety of the Bible has God recanted either command.

It confounds the fact Paul and Peter preached the gospel in the halls of power and influence, amidst the marketplace of ideas... all the way to Caesar's court. The gospel is to be applied by God's people to every aspect of human existence. We are the light on the hill. No one lights a lamp and puts it in a place where it will be hidden, or under a bowl. Instead, they put it on its stand, so that those who come in may see the light.




Darby was wrong. Trevor is wrong.
 
The separation of Christians from the rest of the world was a preeminent feature of John Darby's Dispensationalism in the mid-1800s. As a consequence, a growing number of Christians abdicated all civic responsibility and Darwinism, Marxism, Freudianism, Existentialism, and Postmodernism filled the void. Abortion was the result. Government becoming the messiah was the result. In the late 1960s a theologian named Francis Schaeffer wrote about the Christian failure to maintain both a Christian worldview that applied to all domains of human existence, and participation in God's kingdom resulting in an increase in worldliness. Schaeffer was instrumental in reawakening and re-energizing Christians in America.

Presuppositionally..... what the separation position means is that there are places in God's creation where God doesn't rule and doesn't expect His people to rule. This creates a "two-kingdoms" theology where God rules one way in one kingdom and another not-so-effective way in another. It means God wants it that way. This position means the dominion mandate (Gen. 1:28) has been withdrawn. The great commission (Mt. 28:19-20) is withdrawn.

Yet nowhere in the entirety of the Bible has God recanted either command.

It confounds the fact Paul and Peter preached the gospel in the halls of power and influence, amidst the marketplace of ideas... all the way to Caesar's court. The gospel is to be applied by God's people to every aspect of human existence. We are the light on the hill. No one lights a lamp and puts it in a place where it will be hidden, or under a bowl. Instead, they put it on its stand, so that those who come in may see the light.




Darby was wrong. Trevor is wrong.
I D C
 
Greetings Josheb,
The separation of Christians from the rest of the world was a preeminent feature of John Darby's Dispensationalism in the mid-1800s. As a consequence, a growing number of Christians abdicated all civic responsibility ...

Darby was wrong. Trevor is wrong.
I have quoted the beginning of your post and then the end of your post where you mention my name. I only found your post by reviewing "New Posts", but now I am involved and will receive "Alerts".

Actually I cannot follow what you are claiming in between what I have quoted above. Yes, Christadelphians do try to be separate from many aspects of civilian life. We do not participate in politics, police force, army. Many people dedicate their lives to particular causes, some very worthwhile, but in general we are busy enough with our religious activities. Concerning the Daniel 4:17 quote, yes, we consider the world to be part of the kingdoms of men, Babylon and the nations that have been derived from Babylon. We claim to be pilgrims seeking another country, and we should not meddle in the country of transit, but obey its laws and keep going towards our goal. We strongly preach that Jesus will return and replace the present kingdoms of men with the Kingdom of God Daniel 2:35,44.

Other references that may also be relevant are:
Acts 15:14 (KJV): Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.

1 John 2:15–17 (KJV): 15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.

John 17:11–19 (KJV): 11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are. 12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled. 13 And now come I to thee; and these things I speak in the world, that they might have my joy fulfilled in themselves. 14 I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. 15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil. 16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. 18 As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. 19 And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.


We sometimes use the expression that we need to be in the world, but not of it.

Kind regards
Trevor
 
Sure am glad I no longer need to vote... WOW... that sure takes a great weight off. Thank you Trevor.
Will you also enjoy living in your 15 min city?
 
We sometimes use the expression that we need to be in the world, but not of it.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with civic participation and defies every precedent in scripture and everything I wrote in Post #2. We're supposed to be going out into the world, the desolate earth multiplying, subduing and ruling over it, baptizing the nations and teaching them Christ's commands, taking captive every thought that set itself up against Christ, applying the gospel to every aspect of human existence - including politics - because there isn't a single place in creation where the Creator isn't sovereign or wants neglected by His people.

Proverbs 29:2
When the righteous increase, the people rejoice, but when a wicked person rules, people groan.

That proverb would NEVER be realized if Christadelphian beliefs were universal. We'd all be groaning, which is exactly what happened when Christians started abandoning the marketplaces in the 19th century. Two world wars killed millions, governments stayed in debt, and 65 million unborn humans were killed in one country for the sake of convenience.


I did not know this came from a Christadelphian pov. Christadelphianism arose during the 19th century, along with a host of sects, during what was called the "restoration movement." These sects did not restore anything. They further fragmented the Church and created a host of new theologies, few of which stayed within the pale of orthodoxy. The CoC, SDA, Brethren, Dispensationalists, JWs, LDSes, and Christadelphians did not return to an NT-era expression of Christian faith. John Thomas was a cult leader.
 
We do not participate in politics, police force, army.
And yet you are affected by politics, as is everyone else, and do nothing to contribute to any effort on the part of other believers to vote for candidates with integrity and the interests of the people in mind rather than the interests only of government. (if there are any and there is always a lesser evil) Turn a blind eye to the country you live in and benefit from, all the believers, God, the needs of people who are going to be affected by whatever government is in power.

And yet you gladly accept the protection of the police force and are no doubt grateful they exist.

And yet you gladly accept the loss of life to others who defend the nation you live in, and are no doubt glad there are "those" people, and even more proud of not being like those people.
 
Greetings again Josheb and Greetings Arial,
I did not know this came from a Christadelphian pov. Christadelphianism arose during the 19th century, along with a host of sects, during what was called the "restoration movement." These sects did not restore anything. They further fragmented the Church and created a host of new theologies, few of which stayed within the pale of orthodoxy. The CoC, SDA, Brethren, Dispensationalists, JWs, LDSes, and Christadelphians did not return to an NT-era expression of Christian faith. John Thomas was a cult leader.
I appreciate the motivation behind "the restoration movement". John Thomas became the Editor of a Campbellite Magazine in 1834-1838 and later another magazine series Herald of the Kingdom. He gradually formed different ideas to the Campbellites, and by 1843 he more or less had distinct beliefs. In 1850 he published the book Elpis Israel - An Exposition of the Kingdom of God, then he was the editor for about 10 years of a new magazine series Herald of the Kingdom and Age to Come. He then published a three volume book, now published as five volumes Eureka - An Exposition of the Apocalypse. I very much appreciate his writings and the other major pioneer Robert Roberts who started The Christadelphian magazine some time after the conclusion of the second Herald series. We do not accept every detail that these pioneers wrote, but they established very solidly our understanding of the Gospel of the Kingdom and Name.

As far as the label "cult", I was a bit reticent to respond to this thread because of your earlier response in this thread and especially because of our interaction on Psalm 1. I would define a "cult" as a group of people with strange ideas and strange practices. My estimate of your comments in the Psalm 1 thread as being very strange. Part of this was your denigration of David and the Monarchy. Relevant to the subject of this thread, Politics, this morning I listened to the first of four talks on Ruth. The Book of Ruth is added between Judges and 1 Samuel as a part indication of the transition from the Judges to the Monarchy, and the very last word in the Book of Ruth is "David".
And yet you are affected by politics, as is everyone else, and do nothing to contribute to any effort on the part of other believers to vote for candidates with integrity and the interests of the people in mind rather than the interests only of government.
Yes we do not vote. In Australia voting is compulsory and this is at the three levels Federal Government, State Government and Local Council elections, averaging say one election per year. I have received a notification of failure to vote for each of these for the last 60 years, and in the most recent I think I could pay $100 fine, or give a reason why I was unable to vote, or an explanation of my conscience. I often use or allude to Daniel 4:17 and have never had any of my replies rejected in that 60 years.

Yes, I am interested in observing the political scene, and I am very disturbed by the breaking down of Bible standards by various people in power. The present situation helps me to appreciate the need for Jesus to return and replace the kingdoms of men with the Kingdom of God Daniel 2:35,44-45, 4:17.

In my younger days I worked in a Government Department and we had quite a few people who had been affected by different politics. We had some good engineers whose skills were readily accepted. We had some Hungarians who may have escaped Hungary in 1956, an older Jewish Hungarian who may have escaped Hitler's persecution and a Russian from China who was one of my supervisors. When China and Russia fell out, China used to send their Russian residents back to Russia. When they fell out more, they allowed the Russians to migrate to the West. Before the demise of the USSR he used to send colour photos of his nice brick home and new car in the driveway to his relatives in Russia, who most probably lived in high rise apartments. As far as politics was concerned he used to compare the US elections to those in the USSR. In the USSR they would only have one candidate and he would get 98% of the vote and when parliament was convened they would all stand and applaud, similar to China or North Korea today. But he did not see much selection in the US in those days as he considered that there was not much difference between the two parties. Sadly this may be different today, and the US may face a crisis soon, an indication of end times. Towards the end of my stay in that department we had a young Yugoslav engineer who stated that his aim was to make plenty of money in Australia, and then return to Yugoslavia and live like a king. He was still in Australia when the breakup of Yugoslavia occurred and the various civil wars.

My Russian engineer used to also tell the tale that there was some appeasing of the enmity between the US and the USSR. The Russians were having some trouble with their truck factory and they invited some experts from the US Ford factory. The US visitors came to the factory and there were a few very large black limousines out the front. One of the US delegates asked as to who owns the factory, and the Russians replied, the people. Then they asked who owned the limousines, and they got the answer, the party members. The Russians then were invited to the Ford factory and there was a very large factory with many cars in the car park for the workers. The Russians asked, who owns all those cars, and they received the answer, the people. They then asked, who owns the factory, and the answer was, Mr Ford.
And yet you gladly accept the protection of the police force and are no doubt grateful they exist.
Yes, we thank God for the peace and quiet. The Garden of Gethsemane was a bit different.
And yet you gladly accept the loss of life to others who defend the nation you live in, and are no doubt glad there are "those" people, and even more proud of not being like those people.
War and warfare distress me and we can only feel terribly sad for all of the wars that have occurred and are occurring. The Christadelphian position was formed during the American Civil War when it was considered atrocious for a Christadelphian from the North shooting a Christadelphian from the South and vice versa, or in actual fact, shooting any one for that matter. If you check my age, I was born in 1944. I could elaborate. But on the other hand my father was a foster child as a result of WW1, but at the age of 14 he was fostered to an older couple to work on a farm, and his foster father was an ex-Christadelphian who returned to his faith, and helped my father to join the faith, and sever his political ties as he had been associating with a fascist type group here in Australia.

Kind regards
Trevor
 
Last edited:
(Can we say that is why The Donald got 4 indictments almost back to back?)

Also, That means that Joe, Kamala, Nancy, and even Adam were established from God... and yes, even AOC.

Likely because it is time for the American (Empire) to complete it's fall ... for NO ONE stays on top forever,

Sure am glad I no longer need to vote... WOW... that sure takes a great weight off. Thank you Trevor.
I sure hope this attitude is just tongue in cheek. If not and this kind of attitude prevails we are finished as a a nation. Did Donald get 4 indictments back to back because of karma or because the deep state needs him gone. I would say the latter. Does Joe currently occupy the office because God felt he was the man to lead this great nation or did God allow it to open the eyes of a sleeping population. I would say the latter. This non participation theory is a perversion at worst and misunderstanding of our scriptural obligations at best. Sometimes God allows a people to have the leadership they desire as a lesson not a blessing.
 
1 Samuel 8:18 And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the Lord will not hear you in that day.
 
Yes we do not vote. In Australia voting is compulsory and this is at the three levels Federal Government, State Government and Local Council elections, averaging say one election per year. I have received a notification of failure to vote for each of these for the last 60 years, and in the most recent I think I could pay $100 fine, or give a reason why I was unable to vote, or an explanation of my conscience. I often use or allude to Daniel 4:17 and have never had any of my replies rejected in that 60 years.

Yes, I am interested in observing the political scene, and I am very disturbed by the breaking down of Bible standards by various people in power. The present situation helps me to appreciate the need for Jesus to return and replace the kingdoms of men with the Kingdom of God Daniel 2:35,44-45, 4:17.

In my younger days I worked in a Government Department and we had quite a few people who had been affected by different politics. We had some good engineers whose skills were readily accepted. We had some Hungarians who may have escaped Hungary in 1956, an older Jewish Hungarian who may have escaped Hitler's persecution and a Russian from China who was one of my supervisors. When China and Russia fell out, China used to send their Russian residents back to Russia. When they fell out more, they allowed the Russians to migrate to the West. Before the demise of the USSR he used to send colour photos of his nice brick home and new car in the driveway to his relatives in Russia, who most probably lived in high rise apartments. As far as politics was concerned he used to compare the US elections to those in the USSR. In the USSR they would only have one candidate and he would get 98% of the vote and when parliament was convened they would all stand and applaud, similar to China or North Korea today. But he did not see much selection in the US in those days as he considered that there was not much difference between the two parties. Sadly this may be different today, and the US may face a crisis soon, an indication of end times. Towards the end of my stay in that department we had a young Yugoslav engineer who stated that his aim was to make plenty of money in Australia, and then return to Yugoslavia and live like a king. He was still in Australia when the breakup of Yugoslavia occurred and the various civil wars.

My Russian engineer used to also tell the tale that there was some appeasing of the enmity between the US and the USSR. The Russians were having some trouble with their truck factory and they invited some experts from the US Ford factory. The US visitors came to the factory and there were a few very large black limousines out the front. One of the US delegates asked as to who owns the factory, and the Russians replied, the people. Then they asked who owned the limousines, and they got the answer, the party members. The Russians then were invited to the Ford factory and there was a very large factory with many cars in the car park for the workers. The Russians asked, who owns all those cars, and they received the answer, the people. They then asked, who owns the factory, and the answer was, Mr Ford.
Yes, we thank God for the peace and quiet. The Garden of Gethsemane was a bit different.
War and warfare distress me and we can only feel terribly sad for all of the wars that have occurred and are occurring. The Christadelphian position was formed during the American Civil War when it was considered atrocious for a Christadelphian from the North shooting a Christadelphian from the South and vice versa, or in actual fact, shooting any one for that matter. If you check my age, I was born in 1944. I could elaborate. But on the other hand my father was a foster child as a result of WW1, but at the age of 14 he was fostered to an older couple to work on a farm, and his foster father was an ex-Christadelphian who returned to his faith, and helped my father to join the faith, and sever his political ties as he had been associating with a fascist type group here in Australia.
You quoted me and then produced a long and rambling response that in no way addressed what I said in the quotes you were supposedly responding to. Why?
 
Do not participate in politics - God rules in the kingdoms of men Daniel 4:17

As much as I enjoy a good down in the mud sling fast with those of opposite political views... I think we should all heed @TrevorL 's admonition from Daniel.

After all, we are told that Romans 13:

1Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. 2Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. (Can we say that is why The Donald got 4 indictments almost back to back?)

Also, That means that Joe, Kamala, Nancy, and even Adam were established from God... and yes, even AOC.

Likely because it is time for the American (Empire) to complete it's fall ... for NO ONE stays on top forever,

Sure am glad I no longer need to vote... WOW... that sure takes a great weight off. Thank you Trevor.

Hoping all this is facetious!
 
If you are in America, you are the government. The "government" is temporary representation to do the people's will. But you, the citizen, are the government.
If you don't like that responsibility, you should locate elsewhere.
 
Greetings again Josheb and Greetings Arial,

I appreciate the motivation behind "the restoration movement". John Thomas became the Editor of a Campbellite Magazine in 1834-1838 and later another magazine series Herald of the Kingdom. He gradually formed different ideas to the Campbellites, and by 1843 he more or less had distinct beliefs. In 1850 he published the book Elpis Israel - An Exposition of the Kingdom of God, then he was the editor for about 10 years of a new magazine series Herald of the Kingdom and Age to Come. He then published a three volume book, now published as five volumes Eureka - An Exposition of the Apocalypse. I very much appreciate his writings and the other major pioneer Robert Roberts who started The Christadelphian magazine some time after the conclusion of the second Herald series. We do not accept every detail that these pioneers wrote, but they established very solidly our understanding of the Gospel of the Kingdom and Name.

As far as the label "cult", I was a bit reticent to respond to this thread because of your earlier response in this thread and especially because of our interaction on Psalm 1. I would define a "cult" as a group of people with strange ideas and strange practices. My estimate of your comments in the Psalm 1 thread as being very strange. Part of this was your denigration of David and the Monarchy. Relevant to the subject of this thread, Politics, this morning I listened to the first of four talks on Ruth. The Book of Ruth is added between Judges and 1 Samuel as a part indication of the transition from the Judges to the Monarchy, and the very last word in the Book of Ruth is "David".

Yes we do not vote. In Australia voting is compulsory and this is at the three levels Federal Government, State Government and Local Council elections, averaging say one election per year. I have received a notification of failure to vote for each of these for the last 60 years, and in the most recent I think I could pay $100 fine, or give a reason why I was unable to vote, or an explanation of my conscience. I often use or allude to Daniel 4:17 and have never had any of my replies rejected in that 60 years.

Yes, I am interested in observing the political scene, and I am very disturbed by the breaking down of Bible standards by various people in power. The present situation helps me to appreciate the need for Jesus to return and replace the kingdoms of men with the Kingdom of God Daniel 2:35,44-45, 4:17.

In my younger days I worked in a Government Department and we had quite a few people who had been affected by different politics. We had some good engineers whose skills were readily accepted. We had some Hungarians who may have escaped Hungary in 1956, an older Jewish Hungarian who may have escaped Hitler's persecution and a Russian from China who was one of my supervisors. When China and Russia fell out, China used to send their Russian residents back to Russia. When they fell out more, they allowed the Russians to migrate to the West. Before the demise of the USSR he used to send colour photos of his nice brick home and new car in the driveway to his relatives in Russia, who most probably lived in high rise apartments. As far as politics was concerned he used to compare the US elections to those in the USSR. In the USSR they would only have one candidate and he would get 98% of the vote and when parliament was convened they would all stand and applaud, similar to China or North Korea today. But he did not see much selection in the US in those days as he considered that there was not much difference between the two parties. Sadly this may be different today, and the US may face a crisis soon, an indication of end times. Towards the end of my stay in that department we had a young Yugoslav engineer who stated that his aim was to make plenty of money in Australia, and then return to Yugoslavia and live like a king. He was still in Australia when the breakup of Yugoslavia occurred and the various civil wars.

My Russian engineer used to also tell the tale that there was some appeasing of the enmity between the US and the USSR. The Russians were having some trouble with their truck factory and they invited some experts from the US Ford factory. The US visitors came to the factory and there were a few very large black limousines out the front. One of the US delegates asked as to who owns the factory, and the Russians replied, the people. Then they asked who owned the limousines, and they got the answer, the party members. The Russians then were invited to the Ford factory and there was a very large factory with many cars in the car park for the workers. The Russians asked, who owns all those cars, and they received the answer, the people. They then asked, who owns the factory, and the answer was, Mr Ford.

Yes, we thank God for the peace and quiet. The Garden of Gethsemane was a bit different.

War and warfare distress me and we can only feel terribly sad for all of the wars that have occurred and are occurring. The Christadelphian position was formed during the American Civil War when it was considered atrocious for a Christadelphian from the North shooting a Christadelphian from the South and vice versa, or in actual fact, shooting any one for that matter. If you check my age, I was born in 1944. I could elaborate. But on the other hand my father was a foster child as a result of WW1, but at the age of 14 he was fostered to an older couple to work on a farm, and his foster father was an ex-Christadelphian who returned to his faith, and helped my father to join the faith, and sever his political ties as he had been associating with a fascist type group here in Australia.

Kind regards
Trevor
Way to long a post in defense of a very simple and real fact of Christian history:

The Restoration Movement created a series of divisions in the Church in which radical changes in historical and orthodox Christian thought, doctrine, and practice were made and you are a product of those individuals who believed they were correct and everyone else who came before them was wrong. If JWism, or LDSism, are correct then nothing in Christianity is correct. Everyone living for the first 18 centuries of Christianity was lost in heresy and not saved from sin.

That same concept applies to Christadelphianism.


Can't be had both ways. Much of what was espoused by the "restoration" sects was wrong.
 
Greetings again Arial and Josheb
You quoted me and then produced a long and rambling response that in no way addressed what I said in the quotes you were supposedly responding to. Why?
Perhaps I was trying to illustrate that while we may acknowledge the existence of politics, police force and army and to some extent their necessity, we do not have to participate in any of these. I also believe that our true calling is dedication to God and in reality this excludes us individually from participation. Another example of my experience is war, and I shared a desk in our drawing office with a part time Captain in the Army Reserve in Australia. He was in the Signals area, and spent three months in Vietnam with the US Signals there. On his return he did bring back a bad report to me of some of what he witnessed from the activity of the US military. He claimed that some of the US troops were obsessed with killing and went on a mental high when this happened. Times have changed from those turbulent years in Vietnam, and my nephew after a number of visits and touring large portions of Vietnam on his motorbike, has recently married a Vietnamese and is at present living in Vietnam and conducting his business online, but most probably would like to bring her back to Australia soon when permitted.
The Restoration Movement created a series of divisions in the Church in which radical changes in historical and orthodox Christian thought, doctrine, and practice were made and you are a product of those individuals who believed they were correct and everyone else who came before them was wrong. If JWism, or LDSism, are correct then nothing in Christianity is correct. Everyone living for the first 18 centuries of Christianity was lost in heresy and not saved from sin.
That same concept applies to Christadelphianism.
Can't be had both ways. Much of what was espoused by the "restoration" sects was wrong.
I can only endorse what I consider to be correct Bible teaching and leave all judgement to God. I believe that there have been faithful individuals and pockets of true believers down through the centuries, but I do not consider that there has been a strong unified true Church in the manner you are suggesting. Do you include the Catholic Church or the few major subdivisions in the main Protestant Churches? Church of England, Baptist, Presbyterian, Methodist .... ? And what of their various factions within each of these?

My allegiance is to God and Jesus first, then to my fellowship, then to my contact with neighbours and the world. As far as my fellowship is concerned, I am fiercely independent if I disagree with a decision or point of view as I have on three occasions but willing to submit in silence to some extent to maintain fellowship.

As far as politics, police and army are concerned, Jesus and the Apostles did not participate. God is in control and is outworking His purpose with the nations, and to eventually bring His purpose to fruition, and He will soon replace the present Governments and Religious Organisations with the Kingdom of God upon the earth. Many of these are ripe for some judgement or in severe cases, destruction. I consider that some politicians are raised up to accomplish a particular mission, and are then taken off the scene. Compare some of the Kings in the Northern tribes, such as Jehu, whose main job was to destroy the House of Ahab and destroy the worship of Baal. In modern times there have been Balfour, Hitler, Trump, Boris Johnson and many more who have ruled for a while and accomplished a particular task or a particular failure and then taken off the scene (almost).

Kind regards
Trevor
 
Way to long a post in defense of a very simple and real fact of Christian history:

The Restoration Movement created a series of divisions in the Church in which radical changes in historical and orthodox Christian thought, doctrine, and practice were made and you are a product of those individuals who believed they were correct and everyone else who came before them was wrong. If JWism, or LDSism, are correct then nothing in Christianity is correct. Everyone living for the first 18 centuries of Christianity was lost in heresy and not saved from sin.

That same concept applies to Christadelphianism.


Can't be had both ways. Much of what was espoused by the "restoration" sects was wrong.
Hold up a sec.

The Restoration movement was a reform movement in America that led to the founding of the Church of Christ and the Baptists. It doesn't have anything to do with the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses, other than the coincidence of belonging to the same period of history.

 
The separation of Christians from the rest of the world was a preeminent feature of John Darby's Dispensationalism in the mid-1800s. As a consequence, a growing number of Christians abdicated all civic responsibility and Darwinism, Marxism, Freudianism, Existentialism, and Postmodernism filled the void. Abortion was the result. Government becoming the messiah was the result. In the late 1960s a theologian named Francis Schaeffer wrote about the Christian failure to maintain both a Christian worldview that applied to all domains of human existence, and participation in God's kingdom resulting in an increase in worldliness. Schaeffer was instrumental in reawakening and re-energizing Christians in America.

Presuppositionally..... what the separation position means is that there are places in God's creation where God doesn't rule and doesn't expect His people to rule. This creates a "two-kingdoms" theology where God rules one way in one kingdom and another not-so-effective way in another. It means God wants it that way. This position means the dominion mandate (Gen. 1:28) has been withdrawn. The great commission (Mt. 28:19-20) is withdrawn.

Yet nowhere in the entirety of the Bible has God recanted either command.

It confounds the fact Paul and Peter preached the gospel in the halls of power and influence, amidst the marketplace of ideas... all the way to Caesar's court. The gospel is to be applied by God's people to every aspect of human existence. We are the light on the hill. No one lights a lamp and puts it in a place where it will be hidden, or under a bowl. Instead, they put it on its stand, so that those who come in may see the light.

Darby was wrong.
I agree with this.
 
Hold up a sec.

The Restoration movement was a reform movement in America that led to the founding of the Church of Christ and the Baptists. It doesn't have anything to do with the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses, other than the coincidence of belonging to the same period of history.
That is incorrect.

First of all, Baptists started in the 1600s, not the 1800s. During the 1800s a number of sects were "birthed" beginning with - but not limited to - the Church of Christ, the Seventh Day Adventists, the Brethren sects (which included the latter Dispensationalists of John Darby's and Cyrus Scofield's influences), the Christadelphians, the Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Latter Day Saints. The Methodists and Baptists did markedly ascend in prominence during the 1800s but they had their beginnings long before the restoration movement of the 1800s. What the sects I listed all shared in common was 1) a belief the Church was/is corrupt(ed), 2) the need to return to a New Testament era set of practices, 3) their teaching being the correct return to the NT-era standards, 4) a belief in apocalypse and5) the imminent return of Christ preceded by the removal of Christians from the earth. This can be reduced to simple beliefs: 1) the Church is corrupt and sect X is the true Church and 2) if you belong to us then Jesus will rescue you from the soon-coming apocalypse.

There are sects that fall within the pale of Christian orthodoxy, and sects that do not. The CoC manage to fall within the pale of orthodoxy. The JWs and LDS do not. The inclusion of the SDA is debated. Within those that fall within the pale of orthodoxy is the increasing influence of Darby's hermeneutic that separated Israel from the Church, God having two purposes for creation, one for each group), adhered to a (supposedly) strict literal reading of scripture, and a pre-millennial rapture. Nowadays we have a HUGE section of Christendom that holds these beliefs.

All of it would be alien to you and me if we were Christians living in 1799 or 1800. By the end of the century we'd both be astonished to see how different Christian thought, doctrine, and practice looked. Nowadays the differences are taken for granted and assumed normal and orthodox. Compared to what has been held historically to be mainstream and orthodox little that developed in the 1800s is either.

The Wiki article attended only to that which falls within the pale of orthodox Christianity, but the fact is Charles Taze Russel and Joseph Smith held very similar views and taught the same kind of views as the Campbellites, Millerites, etc. Russel was a Presbyterian/Congregationalist. He was influenced by Miller. Smith came out of the Church of Christ and named his sect the same name. The name change came later.


ALL of these sects also had one other element in common. That influence came from John Wesley and George Whitefield. Wesley's methodism moved Christian life away from creedalism to experientialism. Wesley was in the south and Whitefield in the north (of the US). Their influence was seen and heard in tent revivals across the US and as the country expanded west a huge increase in nondenominational preachers occurred; itinerant preachers going from town to town with no institutional oversight (or much homogeneity in what was taught doctrinally). that emphasis on experientialism grew throughout the restoration movement and eventually resulted in Azusa Stret and another explosion in sectarianism with the rise of Pentecostalism and the Assemblies of God sects.

I just blew through 200 years of modern Christian history, so let me bring it back to the op.

Today we have a lot of Christians who believe the Church is corrupt, the world is going to hell in a hand basket and there is nothing Christians can do about it because it is God's plan for the world to decay, but do not worry because He will rescue His people and remove them from the planet before the tribulation. BECAUSE that is the pre-ordained plan..... there is no sense resisting it. Christians should remove themselves from the affairs of the world and let it happen. Our only job is the preaching of the gospel. John Darby took this to an extreme and it was nearly 100 years before anyone within Dispensationalists circles thought that should change. Those are views that 1) would have been completely alien to Wesley but 2) are nonetheless a direct consequence of an emphasis on personal experiential conversion.
 
Back
Top