AN INSIDE LOOK AT FREE SPEECH

[Buff Scott Jr.]

An inside look at
FREE SPEECH
Should there be limitations?
​

Under the circumstances, ABC probably did the right thing by taking the Talk Show host, Jimmy Kimmel, back. But ABC should caution him, and all of their other Talk Show hosts, about the sensitivity of some verbalizations, which do more harm than good. When we consider Charlie Kirk, a patriot and Christian believer, died at the hands of a demoniacal executor, Kimmel most certainly did indeed do more harm than good with his remarks.

It is irrational to advocate that free speech has no restrains. Our Founding Fathers said as much. The concept of no restraints is completely void of reality and common sense. The spirit of sensitivity is disregarded when we angrily spew out words of hate and disrespect for some fellow citizen who is not speaking or doing what we feel he should be speaking and doing.

Disagreements should never be outlawed. Dialogue, privately and publicly, should be induced and promoted. But a kindred spirit and courtesy should be the center of all conversations, not rudeness and impoliteness. Jimmy Kimmel was guilty of both. In this matter, his political background appears to be one of his negative traits and causative factors of his ill-favored remarks.​

 

[CrowCross]

An inside look at
FREE SPEECH
Should there be limitations?
​

Under the circumstances, ABC probably did the right thing by taking the Talk Show host, Jimmy Kimmel, back. But ABC should caution him, and all of their other Talk Show hosts, about the sensitivity of some verbalizations, which do more harm than good. When we consider Charlie Kirk, a patriot and Christian believer, died at the hands of a demoniacal executor, Kimmel most certainly did indeed do more harm than good with his remarks.

It is irrational to advocate that free speech has no restrains. Our Founding Fathers said as much. The concept of no restraints is completely void of reality and common sense. The spirit of sensitivity is disregarded when we angrily spew out words of hate and disrespect for some fellow citizen who is not speaking or doing what we feel he should be speaking and doing.

Disagreements should never be outlawed. Dialogue, privately and publicly, should be induced and promoted. But a kindred spirit and courtesy should be the center of all conversations, not rudeness and impoliteness. Jimmy Kimmel was guilty of both. In this matter, his political background appears to be one of his negative traits and causative factors of his ill-favored remarks.​

There's more to the Jimmy Kimmel story than meets the eye.

Basically the way I see it JK bucked the system of the narrative and was put back in his place. "The sensitivity of some verbalizations" was for the most part a convenient excuse.
The JK show was in the tanks and JK was making too much money for what they were getting in return. So they needed an excuse to "suspend" him.
The real reason...JK brought up the "E" word...Epstein.

But ABC isn't allowed to say that as it might get back into the news cycle....

Anyway, JK seems to have won and had to deliver some sort of non-apology to his viewers. Who knows, maybe his rating will spike.

 

[Buff Scott Jr.]

There's more to the Jimmy Kimmel story than meets the eye.

Basically the way I see it JK bucked the system of the narrative and was put back in his place. "The sensitivity of some verbalizations" was for the most part a convenient excuse.
The JK show was in the tanks and JK was making too much money for what they were getting in return. So they needed an excuse to "suspend" him.
The real reason...JK brought up the "E" word...Epstein.

But ABC isn't allowed to say that as it might get back into the news cycle....

Anyway, JK seems to have won and had to deliver some sort of non-apology to his viewers. Who knows, maybe his rating will spike.

Thanks for your remarks, CrowCross. I suspect many other readers will voice their sentiments as well.​